Actor and politician Ravi Kishan has received interim relief from the Delhi High Court. The court passed an interim order to protect his personality rights, preventing various individuals, websites and online platforms from using Ravi Kishan’s name, image, likeness and other personality attributes without his permission.
Court orders removal of objectionable content
According to an ANI report, the court order also covers the use of artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence, machine learning and deepfake technology.Talking about the details of the case, Justice Jyoti Singh heard it after Ravi Kishan filed a suit to protect himself from the alleged misuse of his identity on social media and online platforms.The court also ordered the removal of URLs allegedly containing obscene, pornographic and AI-generated content using the identity of Ravi Kishan. The defendants and concerned domain registrars have been asked to remove the listed URLs within three days of receiving the order.The court further said that if they don’t, platforms like Meta, Google and X must start removing the URLs in question within 72 hours of being notified.
What are the next hearing dates?
According to the case filed by Ravi Kishan, various websites and social media accounts allegedly uploaded objectionable videos, false statements, AI-generated videos and sexually explicit content using his name and image without permission. He also claimed that some websites were using his name in keywords and URLs to host pornographic content.The High Court has issued a summons in this case. The accused have been directed to file their written statements within 30 days.The matter will next come before the Joint Registry on 13 August 2026, while the application for an interim injunction is scheduled for court on 16 October 2026.On the acting front, he was recently seen in the legal comedy serial ‘Maamla Legal Hai’.Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on a legal hearing as reported by a third-party source. The data provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing and no final verdict has been reached. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.