Rajpal Yadav has been in the middle of legal trouble since the last few months. After getting bail and being released from Tihar jail in a Rs 9 crore debt case, the actor was given time to repay the loan but continued to violate court orders. For those who don’t know, Rajpal Yadav is in a legal dispute with Madhavav Gopal Agrawal, who represents M/s Murali Projects Pvt Ltd. According to the court’s verdict on Friday, Yadav has received no relief and has been sentenced to three months in jail.Explaining why the actor has been given three months in jail, advocate Avnish Sikka, representing Murli Projects Pvt Ltd, said, as reported by ANI, “Today, the cases filed by Rajpal Yadav were reserved for warrants. According to the Delhi High Court the judgment, the 21 cases filed by Rajpal Yadav have been dismissed and the order passed by the Sessions court has been confirmed. The court ordered him to a prison term of three months; he has also been ordered to pay a fine of Rs 1.05 crore in each case. The sentence of 3 months in prison must be concurrent. Ms. Radha Rajpal Yadav was also one of the accused in these cases. He has been ordered to pay Rs 5 lakh as fine in each case. While the case was being heard, his lawyer prayed for probation. The court denied her parole relief. The court has taken into account the repeated violation of his undertakings against the court, along with the fact that on the last day Rajpal Yadav said, “I am ready to go to jail 5 times but I will not pay a single penny.” He has been given two months to comply with the order or challenge the judgment in the Supreme Court.”For those who don’t know, earlier businessman Madhav Gopal Agrawal, who had lent Rs 5 crore to the actor for his 2012 directorial venture ‘Ata Pata Laapata’, had accepted the loan after Rajpal’s wife Radha sent him emotional messages asking for help. He stressed that the agreement clearly stated that the refund would not be influenced by the film’s box office performance, censor certification or any other hurdle. The actor, he said, had also provided a personal guarantee. The businessman added that the transaction was strictly a loan and not an investment, noting that investments typically do not involve personal guarantees or post-dated checks.Yadav has since refused to return the money. Agarwal also said that during the initial phase of the dispute, he visited the actor’s residence and “wept in front of him like a child”, explaining that the funds he had lent were themselves lent to others. He said he repeatedly asked Rajpal to provide a specific date so that a new agreement could be drawn up.